Crack bright Bag: Yin Yang granny square
Just like Jolande said: round 8 is not correct, you mustn't skip 3, but 2 stitches each time. These include Ueberschall, Diginoiz, Prototype Samples, Vandalism, JKSound, Bluezone Corporation, Xenos Soundworks, Pulsed Records, W. A. Production, The One Series, Function Loops, Baltic Audio, and our very own label, Producer Loops, to name just a. Join an activity with your class and find or create your own quizzes and flashcards. 8051 Microcontroller: 8051 LED TOGGLE PROGRAM CODE check here. I have 2 more clovers than the pattern specifies.
PROFESSIONAL ENHANCEMENT: MOCK AMCAT IT SKILL QUESTIONS
The left parenthesis key becomes the comma key, and the right parenthesis key is the predict key (LR mode only). Fl Studio Serial Numbers List https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=1154. The last pair of boot cuffs I'll preview here is my favorite. Simply remove the pieces from the tray and pack them up again. Sewing threads that match color of yarn and lining (or invisible threads).
Hooks, Books & Me: Pattern release for "Aryaa Doily"
Therefore I can say it is a very easy. New Features: Faster flow Create audio clips from your instruments. While, Do While, Conditional loops. Yo and pull through all four loops on hook. My Nelco is model 1603, serial number 0070.
Code.org - Minecraft Hour of Code
At this point you should go from tens of thousands to less than 100. I inquired about casting numbers underneath the bed, but only one number was a significant clue -the one number under the lip said JA-13 indicating KOYO was the manufacturer in Japan. Cracktaking has a Great collection of all your Daily use Cracks Tools. Recipe" Loops and Samples Pack old school sample pack with over 700 MB of samples & loop chops. Rd 4: working in back loops only, sc in next 13 sc, (holding next sc on LEG and first sc on TOENAIL together and working through both thicknesses, sc in next 2 sc) 3 times.
Download FL Studio 11.1.1 Crack
Here's how to make your copy of windows genuine. Create: Kata - free crochet square pattern click to investigate. Andy's Cabinet: September 2020. CodeMonkey is a fun and educational game-based environment where kids learn to code without any prior experience. Write a C program to check whether a number is divisible by 5 and 11 or not.
Sample Packs, Sound Kits, Music Loops & Audio Loops
My game Planet Golf for the Commodore 64 even includes Full Motion Video running from a floppy disk. What was the inflation rate in 2020. I just thought I would let you know in case this is a mistake but it could possibly be me as I am only beginning to. I also added some little fabric loops to the patches here and there. M Universal key generator, M xres3.01, Net stores E-Commerce Extensions Dream Weaver 3, shockwave 8.
- Djkanky Produccions: Cakewalk SONAR Platinum v126.96.36.199
- FL Studio Producer Edition 11.0.0 Final-R2R Free Download
- Lupey Loops: Slip Stitch (Bosnian Crochet) Scarves
- Reggae Sample Packs & Sounds to Download
- CRACK AND KEYGEN: Waves SSL 4000 v1.2 VST\DX\RTAS (PC)
- Ansible nested loops
- Si Nanay Madel: Jenny Hat
- My Games: AVS VIDEO CONVERTER 8.3 KEYGEN
- Mrs. Richardson's Adventures in Math Class: January 2020
- Lesson 11: Infinite and Finite Loops - C Tutorial
- GraphPad Prism 9 Crack [Win & MAC] 2020 Serial Number
- Mihai Sorohan Music Corner: Free Trumpet Loop Packs
- Learn to Code - for Free
- 2020 CSI: fingerprint database
|1||One Week Wonder: 2020-11-20||57%|
|2||Free 115bpm Psychedelic Drum loops samples wav download #94148||97%|
|3||Kunci Jawaban All Quiz Oracle Academy Java Fundamental||29%|
|4||Mastering Mastering Physics Problems & Step-By-Step||82%|
|5||Download Free Reggae Music Loops Samples Sounds Beats Wavs||78%|
|6||ZCracked Software - Full Version Software Crack Free Download||52%|
Visual Basic 6.0 - Superior Source Code: 2020
Join to top of first cluster with a sl st and fasten off. Little Limpet: Free Cuttlefish Crochet Pattern. I also show where loops can be useful. Free Loops & Free Drum Loops. In row 1 you made loops in row 2 you only make stitches in 2 places - inside the loops and between the loops.
AutoCAD 2020.1.2 Crack Product Key Generator 100% Patch
You create page A which list what you need to do and then create page B which has the details of page A and you only want to view the content of page B when you click on a particular statement like read more - here, a. These are read only variables, present in-memory cache on every machine. Want You Back" by The Jackson 5, "I Got You (I Feel Good)" by James Brown and "Viva Las Vegas" by Elvis Presley will get you up on your feet. Mark for Review (1) Points The line=11 means the jdb executed line 11 bytecode in the method1 method. All the TTL on buses were new now so I checked traces between the program ROMs and RAMs but they were all OK - 11 * LS245 (Fujitsu) - 4 * LS283 (Fujitsu) - 2 * LS374.
Activation key free crochet patterns and video tutorials: Amazing crochet
Reverse MIDI and automation with one click. Here you may go from about a hundred thousand files to tens of thousands. Otherwise known as loops. The delay is implemented by using three nested loops. Fruity Loops Plugin Pack Release 2, Fruity Loops Pro 1.76 TS404, Fruity Loops Pro 2.11 TS404, Fruity Loops Pro v2.5, Fruity Loops Pro v2.54.
Fancy Text Generator
Free source code and tutorials for Software developers and Architects; Updated: 22 Nov 2020. Free Hip-Hop Loops and Drums from r-loops is a collection of 112 sounds that are intended to build Dirty South, Hip Hop music. FL Studio 11 Free Download FL Studio 11 Crack site here. Image-Line FL Studio 12.0.1 Reg Key Only https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=1152. Smart Serials: Your serial numbers database.
Key fL Studio Full Cracked Collection Free Download: FL Studio
Filled with retro-future electronic breaks, spacey leads, dream-driven arps, bubbling basses, atmospheric pads, FX and drum hits, this pack is the perfect source of inspiration. Related Posts with thumbnails for blogger blogger widgets. Y loops 11 crack only blogspot. FL Studio Full Cracked Collection Free Download moved here. For now, let's just say that the delay is long enough for the human eye to witness the LED blinking.
Artisteer 4.3 activation key, github is home to over 40
Keynames["a" key] keynames keynames["a"] keynames (*) [Incorrect] Incorrect. [Free Download] Full Cymatics - Savage Drums for Trap https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=1143. C LANGUAGE CODE: As you can see, it becomes. Rnd 15: *Knit 1, skp * repeat for round. In this challenge, you will learn to implement the basic functionalities of pointers in C. A pointer in C is a way to share a memory address among different contexts (primarily functions).
Help flashing coreboot to Lenovo X1 Yoga Gen 1
I’m a newbie to coreboot, and still pretty new to hardware, so forgive any stupid questions :)
tl;dr - Lenovo X1 Yoga Gen 1, model 20FR, having troubles getting coreboot flashed. I flash via SPI (Buspirate connected to rpi) successfully after building coreboot using 4.11 branch, mainboard of x1_carbon_gen1 main board (I think this is part of my issue?) but after flashing when I try to boot, the keyboard lights and power LED flash and then everything shuts back off, no post that I can tell. Curious how I can better debug what's failing, or if there are other good candidate mainboards I could try?
I have an X1 Yoga 1st gen that I’m attempting to flash coreboot to. At this point I’ve been somewhat following along the wiki for the X1 Carbon here, as it seems like they’re very similar systems, but I worry me doing this is a big portion of my issues, and haven't been able to figure out a better mainboard candidate (I also tried flashing .
The chip I’m SPI flashing to/from is a Winbond 25q128. I’m using a Raspberry Pi 4 with a bus pirate for SPI, BP firmware was recently upgraded to v6.2: HiZ>i Bus Pirate v3.5 Firmware v6.2-beta1 r1981 Bootloader v4.4 DEVID:0x0447 REVID:0x3046 (24FJ64GA002 B8) http://dangerousprototypes.com Before attempting any writing I pull of the image twice and compare the hashes to verify my connection, using an SOIC 8 pin clip that I've wired up following the Winbond chip spec: ``` $ flashrom -p buspirate_spi:dev=/dev/ttyUSB0 -c W25Q128.V -r test_out.1 flashrom v1.2 on Linux 5.4.0-1015-raspi (aarch64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at https://flashrom.org
Using clock_gettime for delay loops (clk_id: 1, resolution: 1ns). Found Winbond flash chip "W25Q128.V" (16384 kB, SPI) on buspirate_spi. Reading flash... done. $ flashrom -p buspirate_spi:dev=/dev/ttyUSB0 -c W25Q128.V -r test_out.2 flashrom v1.2 on Linux 5.4.0-1015-raspi (aarch64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at https://flashrom.org
Using clock_gettime for delay loops (clk_id: 1, resolution: 1ns). Found Winbond flash chip "W25Q128.V" (16384 kB, SPI) on buspirate_spi. Reading flash... done. $ shasum -a 256 ./* 248f4e42045ebe917e11e5880a29d842d0839b4c2aa0698f3800ee3fd195b593 ./test_out.1 248f4e42045ebe917e11e5880a29d842d0839b4c2aa0698f3800ee3fd195b593 ./test_out.2 ```
I’ve cloned the coreboot repository and am operating off of the 4.11 branch as I was having some build issues off of master, specifically some compiler warnings/errors that I wasn’t ambitious enough to dig into. I’ve tried to list the settings I’ve specified with make menuconfig. Some of these were specified due to recs from tutorials I've been following (1 and 2 for the most part), others because I was under the impression reading the description it was something I wanted: General Setup: * Use ccache * Use CMOS for config vals * Compress ramstage with LZMA * Include the coreboot .config file in ROM image * Create table of timestamps collected during boot Mainboard: * Vendor: Lenovo * Model: ThinkPad X1 carbon gen 1 (I also tried ThinkPad X1, no dice) * ROM Chip size: 16M * System Power state: S5 Soft Off * CBFS FS In ROM: 0x100000 Chipset: * Enable VMX * Set IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL Lock bit * Validate Intel firmware descriptor * Beep on fatal error * Flash LEDs on fatal * Add intel descripto.bin * Add intel me/txe firmware * Verify integrity * Strip down ME/TXE firmware Devices: * Use onboard VGA as primary video * Enable PCIe clock power mgmt * Enable PCIe ASPM L1 Substate Generic Drivers: * Support intel PCI-e WiFi adapters * PS/2 Keyboard init Payload: * SeaBIOS version 1.12.1 * Hardware Init during option ROM exec * Include gen'd OROM that implements legacy VGA BIOS compatibility I’ve then used ifdtool on the read out image to grab the descriptor.bin and me.bin with: $ ifdtool -d winbond_firm.bin.1 And then copied these to the 3rd party dir with, and renamed the files appropriately: $ cp ./winbond_W25Q128.V/flashregion_* ../../repos/coreboot/3rdparty/blobs/mainboard/lenovo/x1_carbon_gen1/ $ cd ../../repos/coreboot/3rdparty/blobs/mainboard/lenovo/x1_carbon_gen1/ $ mv flashregion_1_bios.bin me.bin $ mv flashregion_2_intel_me.bin me.bin Running make goes through alright, I've stripped the output but can provide full build logs if that's helpful: ``` $ make
…CBFS payload_config CBFS payload_revision CBFS spd.bin DD Adding Intel Firmware Descriptor File build/coreboot.pre is 16777216 bytes IFDTOOL me.bin -> coreboot.pre File build/coreboot.pre is 16777216 bytes File 3rdparty/blobs/mainboard/lenovo/x1_carbon_gen1/me.bin is 7327744 bytes Adding 3rdparty/blobs/mainboard/lenovo/x1_carbon_gen1/me.bin as the Intel ME section of build/coreboot.pre Writing new image to build/coreboot.pre.new ME_CLEANER coreboot.pre IFDTOOL Unlocking Management Engine File build/coreboot.pre is 16777216 bytes Writing new image to build/coreboot.pre.new CBFS coreboot.rom SeaBIOS Wait up to 5000 ms for PS/2 keyboard controller initialization CBFSLAYOUT coreboot.rom
This image contains the following sections that can be manipulated with this tool:
'RW_MRC_CACHE' (size 65536, offset 15728640) 'COREBOOT' (CBFS, size 982528, offset 15794688)
It is possible to perform either the write action or the CBFS add/remove actions on every section listed above. To see the image's read-only sections as well, rerun with the -w option. CBFSPRINT coreboot.rom
FMAP REGION: COREBOOT Name Offset Type Size Comp cbfs master header 0x0 cbfs header 32 none fallback/romstage 0x80 stage 84372 none cpu_microcode_blob.bin 0x14a80 microcode 26624 none fallback/ramstage 0x1b300 stage 118592 none vgaroms/seavgabios.bin 0x38280 raw 27136 none config 0x3ed00 raw 706 none revision 0x3f000 raw 679 none cmos.default 0x3f300 cmos_default 256 none cmos_layout.bin 0x3f440 cmos_layout 1804 none fallback/postcar 0x3fbc0 stage 18204 none fallback/dsdt.aml 0x44340 raw 14768 none fallback/payload 0x47d40 simple elf 67312 none payload_config 0x58480 raw 1700 none payload_revision 0x58b80 raw 237 none spd.bin 0x58cc0 spd 768 none etc/ps2-keyboard-spinup 0x59000 raw 8 none (empty) 0x59040 null 552280 none bootblock 0xdfdc0 bootblock 65536 none
Built lenovo/x1_carbon_gen1 (ThinkPad X1 carbon gen 1) and then I flash it to the chip: $ flashrom -p buspirate_spi:dev=/dev/ttyUSB0 -c W25Q128.V -w build/coreboot.rom flashrom v1.2 on Linux 5.4.0-1015-raspi (aarch64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at https://flashrom.org
Using clock_gettime for delay loops (clk_id: 1, resolution: 1ns). Found Winbond flash chip "W25Q128.V" (16384 kB, SPI) on buspirate_spi. Reading old flash chip contents... done. Erasing and writing flash chip... Erase/write done. Verifying flash... VERIFIED. ``` But after re-attaching the battery and attempting to boot, all that happens is the keyboard and power LED flash once then the whole system shuts back down. Attached is an image of the board and the SPI attachment to the Winbond chip.
Curious if anyone has any recs of what mainboard I might be able to use or if there are docs I'm missing or other good debugging steps I could take to better identify what's failing? Thanks in advance if you made it all this way!
Experiment part 2 Spin
Below is a selection of the important experiments which helped to form quantum mechanics. It's presented in table form.
Name of experiment
Name of relevant physicists and contribution
What's the deviation compared to classical
Thermal radiation of different frequencies emitted by a body.
Max Planck, for putting the adhoc solution E=nhf.
Classical theories can account for ends of high frequency and low frequency using two equations, Max Planck's one equation combined them both.
Light seems to carry energy in quantised quantity, the origin of quantum, thought of as mathematical trick.
Photo electric effect
Albert Einstien, for taking seriously the suggestion that light is quantized.
We expect that light can expel electron at any frequency, but reality is, only light with high enough frequency can expel electrons.
The beginning of taking the maths of quantum physics seriously as stories, that light is a particle called photon.
Hydrogen Atomic spectra
Niels Bohr, for explaining the spectra lines with Bohr atomic model.
Updated the Rutherford model of the atom (just 2 years old then) to become Bohr model. Rutherford model has one positive nucleus at the centre and electrons just scattered around it, Bohr had the electron orbits around the nucleus, like a mini solar system, which is still our popular conception of the atom, even when it has been outdated.
Serves as a clue in the development of quantum mechanics. It predicts angular momentum is quantised, which leads to the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Otto Stern and Walter Gerlach, for discovering that spatial orientation of angular momentum is quantised.
If atoms were classically spinning objects, their angular momentum is expected to be random and continuously distributed, the results should be some density distribution, but what is observed is a discrete separation due to quantised angular momentum.
- Measurement changes the system being measured in quantum mechanics. Only the spin of an object in one direction can be known, and observing the spin in another direction destroys the original information about the spin.
- The results of the measurement is probabilistic: any individual atom sent into the apparatus have equal chance of going up or down. Unless we already know from previous measurement its spin in the same direction.
Young's double-slit experiment with electrons
Thomas Young did it with light first in 1801, then Davisson and Germer in 1927 used electrons with crystals, finally Clauss Jönsson made the thought experiment a reality. In 1974, Pier Giorgio Merli did it with single electrons.
If electrons does not have wavelike properties like a classical ball, it would never have shown interference patterns. The double-slit experiment is now also capable of being done with single particles, interference still occurs. Classical expectation would not have allowed single particle to interfere with itself.
The double-slit experiment is still widely used as the introduction to quantum weirdness, likely popularised by Richard Feymann's claim that all the mysteries of the quantum is in this experiment. Since then, it's possible to explain single particles quantum behaviour without the mysteries. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012118
Bell's Inequality Violation
Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, for bringing up the EPR paradox, John Bell for formulating the paradox into a Bell inequality, Alain Aspect for testing CHSH, a version of Bell's inequality, B. Hensen et. al. did a loop hole free version in 2015.
If the world behaves classically, that is it has locality (only nearby things affect each other at most at the speed of light), counterfactual definiteness (properties of objects exist before we measure them), and freedom (physical possibility of determining settings on measurement devices independently of the internal state of the physical system being measured), then Bell's inequality cannot be violated. Quantum entangled systems can violate Bell's inequality. Showing that one of the three assumptions of the classical world has to be discarded.
The world accepts the existence1999 of quantum entanglement, this also leads to more research into fundamental quantum questions as EPR was for a long time considered unbeneficial fundamental question. However, on closer inspection as in with Bell's inequality, it revealed new stuffs to us, and helped usher in the age of quantum information technology.
Delayed-choice quantum eraser
Yoon-Ho Kim et. al. for doing the experiment, John Archibald Wheeler thought of the original thought experiment of delayed choice.
Quantum eraser is that one can erase the which-way information after measuring it, thus determining the results of interference or no interference pattern on the double slit. The delayed choice means one can determine to erase or not after the measurement was done. So how we describe the past depends on what happens in the future, contrary to our intuition that the past is fully described by events happening in the past. Note what happens is the same, just that new information can be gained based on decisions in the future.
This is one of the popular counter-intuitive experiments commonly used to evaluate and test out our intuition about quantum mechanics and its interpretations. It's frequently used in many popular accounts of quantum physics.
We will only be looking at the last four experiments in detail.
The set up is to shoot silver atoms to an unequal distribution (inhomogeneous) of magnetic field. As suggested by Bohr, angular momentum is quantised. You can think of spin as a form of angular momentum. For those who forgot what angular momentum is, it is mass times velocity times radius of rotation for a massive body rotating around an axis. It can be generalised to everything that rotates has angular momentum. All particles possess this spin property, we call it intrinsic angular momentum. That's not to say that it physically spin. Why?
Let’s assume that the electron is a small ball, of the radius 10-19 m, corresponding to the smallest distance probed by Large Hadron Collider. In the standard model, the electron is basically zero size, a zero-dimensional point particle, but for the sake of imagining it spinning around, we give it size for now. The electron has an intrinsic angular momentum of 1/2 of reduced Planck’s constant. Numerically that’s 5.27 x 10-35 kg m2 s-1. Moment of inertia of a solid sphere is 0.4 MR2, for electron, that’s 3.6 x 10-69 kgm2. So calculating the angular velocity of the electron, we divide the angular momentum by the moment of inertia, we get 1.4 x 1031s-1. That is the electron spins that many times per second, putting in radius of electron to calculate the velocity at the surface of the electron as sphere, we get 1.4 x 1012 ms-1. That’s much faster than light which is in the order of 108 ms-1. The smaller radius we give the electron, the higher the velocity we get. So we cannot interpret spin as the subatomic particles physically spinning.
Silver atoms also has spin. As silver atoms are made up of charged parts, and moving charges generates magnetic fields, all particles made out of charged parts or has charges behave like little magnets (magnetic dipole). And these little magnets should be deflected by the inhomogeneous magnetic field. We use silver atoms to have neutral electrical charge, so that we only see spin in the following experiment.
Say, if we imagine electrons, protons etc as physically spinning (which I warned is the wrong picture), we would expect that the magnet can point in any direction along the up-down axis. To make it more concrete, look at the picture and take the Cartesian coordinates z as the direction in which line 4 points at, the up or down along the screen. y-coordinate is the direction from the source of the Silver atoms, 1 to the screen. x-coordinate is left and right of the screen then. So the measurement of the spin is now orientated along the z-axis, the up-down axis. If the spin is fully pointing along up or down z direction, it will have maximum deflection as shown on 5. If the spin has y-components, so that it can have a distribution of values between the ups and downs of z-axis, then we would expect 4 to be the results of the experiment. This again is the classical picture of thinking of spin as physical rotation, so classical results are 4 on the screen.
Experimentally, the results are always 5. Never any values in between. This might look weird, and indeed is the start of many of the weird concepts we will explore below which is fundamental in the Copenhagen Introduction to quantum mechanics.
Some questions you might want to ask is, do the spins have ups and downs initially (stage one), but they are snap into up or down only via the measurement (stage two)? Or is it something else more tricky?
Stern–Gerlach experiment: Silver atoms travelling through an inhomogeneous magnetic field, and being deflected up or down depending on their spin; (1) furnace, (2) beam of silver atoms, (3) inhomogeneous magnetic field, (4) classically expected result, (5) observed result
Photo by Tatoute - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=34095239
Further magical property is that if I remove the screen, put another inhomogeneous magnetic field pointed along the x-axis (henceforth called a measurement in x-axis) on the beam of atoms which has up z-spin. (The same results happens even if I choose the down z-spin.) Then what I have is two streams pointed left (x+) and right (x-). That's to be expected. If I bring apply again the z-axis measurement onto any of these left or right spins, the results split again into up and down z-axis.
If you think that this tells us that we cannot assume that the particle remembers its previous spin, then apply another z-axis measurement onto the up z-spin particles, they all go up as shown in the picture below. S-G stands for Stern-Gerlach apparatus, the measurement apparatus which is basically just the inhomogeneous magnetic field. One way to interpret this is that depending on how you measure, measurement changes what is measured.
Picture from Wikipedia
If you put another x-axis measurement as the third measurement on the middle part, one for each beam, the beam which has up x-axis (x+) will 100% go up again, and the one with down x-axis (x-) will go 100% go down again.
It seems that the rules are
a. Measurement changes the system being measured in quantum mechanics. Only the spin of an object in one direction can be known, and observing the spin in another direction destroys the original information about the spin.
b. The results of the measurement is probabilistic: any individual atom sent into the apparatus have an equal chance of going up or down. Unless we already know from previous measurement its spin in the same direction.
This does lead to two things which is troubling to classical thinking. Contextuality or the answer depends on the question. And inherent randomness. More on contextuality later, for now, we focus on randomness. Normal randomness we have in the classical world is due to insufficient information in the world. If we gather enough data, we can always predict the results of coin toss or dice roll. Yet, in the quantum systems, there seems to be no internal mechanism for them (or is there? Look out for hidden variables interpretation), we have the maximum information from its wavefunction (according to Copenhagen interpretation) and thus the randomness is inherent in nature.
Some people do not like inherent randomness, some do. Why? Classical physics is very much based on Newtonian clockwork view of the universe. With the laws of motion in place, we had discovered also how heat flows, how electromagnetism works, even all the way to how spacetime and mass-energy affect each other in general relativity. One thing is common to all of these. They are deterministic laws. That is if by some magic, we can get all the information in the world at one slice of time (for general relativity, it means one hypersurface), plug it into the classical equations, we can predict all of the past and future to any arbitrary accuracy, without anything left to chance, randomness. That's a worldview of the universe which is deterministic, clockwork, incompatible with anything which has intrinsic, inherent randomness.
So, some view that the main goal of interpretation is to get back into the deterministic way of the universe. Yet, others see this indeterminism as an advantage as it allows for free will. More on that later. For now, let us jump on board to try to save determinism.
If we do not like intrinsic randomness, if we insist that there is some classical way to reproduce this result, then one fun way to think about it is that each particle has its own internal if-then preparations. The particle instructions are: If I encounter the z measurement, I will go up, if x, then I will go left, if z after x, then I will go down, or else I will go up. And so on. We shall explore this in detail in the next section on playing a quantum game, to try to use classical strategies to simulate quantum results.
We intuitively believe in cause and effect relationships, yet intrinsic randomness seems to be at odds with causal relationships. Think about it. The same atoms of silver prepared the same way, say after it exited the z-axis, we only select the spin up z-axis silver atoms. When we put in another cause of putting a measurement of x-axis to it, it splits into up x and down x. Same atoms with the exact same wavefunctions, thus same causes, same conditions of putting measurement on x-axis, different results of up and down in x-axis. That intrinsic randomness according to some quantum interpretations has no hidden variables beneath it. So if we wish to recover predictability and get rid of intrinsic randomness, we better pay attention to try to simulate the quantum case using classical strategies to avoid intrinsic randomness.