Antenna-Theory.com - Field Regions
Question Best directional antenna for long(ish) range 5.8Ghz fpv? Built-in software and auto switching antenna system to 24 GHz means no additional antennas, cables, or laptop are required; Touch screen allows you to pan, zoom, drag, and move; The lightweight unit weighs only 9.6 lbs/4.4 kg providing bench-top spectrum analyzer capabilities in portable design; Battery run time is 3-4 hours; RF traces are easily mapped; reference and target traces are. The new 3.650-3.7 GHz band is ideal for WISP use as there is no interference from home gateways, microwave ovens or cordless phones. 24 GHz LTCC Fractal Antenna Array SoP with Integrated. Microwave transmission is the transmission of information by microwave radio waves.
Recent Advances in Wearable Antenna Technologies: A Review
Antennas for 24 GHz - [HOST]: wi-fi antennas. Compared to the substrate-based UCs loaded with p-i-n diodes, the proposed UCs have full-metal structures without using any active RF components and dielectric substrates, leading to the high. ADS; ADS; The Excel spreadsheet with gain data and graphs may be. The measured S 11 BW of the total antenna is from 75.57 to 84.18 GHz (10.89%), which is in agreement with the simulated results. The antenna bandwidth is slightly greater than 1 GHz.
Example 14: UWB Spiral Antenna - Antenna Test Lab Co
This paper presents a new design to realize a compact Rotman lens-fed antenna array. In addition to the advantages of low cost, simple structure, and wide operating band, the T- shape slot antenna has nearly omnidirectional radiation. The aim was to design an antenna that in azimuth has lobes below -20 dB in ISM range of 24.05-24.25 GHz, at which the anticollision radar operates. Directivity, 10 1-8 Directivity Estimates, 11 1-8.1 Pencil Beam, 11 1-8.2 Butter y or Omnidirectional Pattern, 13 1-9 Beam Ef ciency, 16 1-10 Input-Impedance Mismatch Loss, 17 1-11 Polarization, 18. 24 ghz patch antenna radiation.
Antenna - how much power is radiated by cell towers
FPV live video using radio frequency antenna, transmitter and receiver signaling technology is one of the main reasons why drones have become so popular. WAVEGUIDE CONDUCTOR-BACKED CO-PLANAR RESONATOR ANTENNA ON. May 24, 2020 at 11: 39 pm Wonderfully in-depth and useful. Here are the parameters for my 7-Element standard version (2.4G) build with 3 mm alu rods. Page 21: Chapter 2 Installation.
US20050074123A1 - Cruable U-NII wireless radio with secure
Equipment is certified to the requirements of RSS-247 for 2.4-GHz. Preventing Radio-Frequency Interference https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=3046. However, the current Universal Serial Bus (USB) antenna exhibits disadvantages of small bandwidth, susceptibility to environmental change and transmitting. Norton 360 Deluxe 2020, Antivirus software for 5 Devices and 1-year subscription with. Changing the TL impedance to 112.8 Ohms (20 mils) reduces the input impedance to 50.2-23.4j.
- Molex 2.4GHz / 5GHz Antenna Kit
- Multiple Studies Strongly Suggest Wireless Radiation Is
- Easy to Build WIFI 2.4GHz Yagi Antenna: 8 Steps (with
- Backfire 2.4 GHz WiFi Antenna
- Other Test Antennas for sale
- Activating Your 5D Frequency A Guidebook for the Journey
- Low cost PCB antenna for 2.4 GHz radio: meander design for
- Audience LTE6 kit - User manuals - MikroTik Documentation
- 24 GHz transceiver - BGT24MTR12 - Infineon Technologies
- Analysis and Simulation of Wide band 24 GHz Planar
- Range calculations for 900MHz/2.4GHz RF links - RC Groups
- 24 GHz Guide to teh Operation of Amateur Stations
- On-chip Integrated Antenna Structures 1n for 60 GHz WPAN
- 1 Getting Started - LG LAS454B Owner's Manual - Page 4 of 24
- Modify 2.4ghz radio antenna for long range - Page 2
- Best antenna for an SDR radio telescope?: RTLSDR
- TBMA1 biconical measurement antenna
- 466837HO553R24 ATE24 Transciever User Manual 2.4GHz
- A Corner Reflector Antenna on Slot Antenna Driven for 2
- Recently Active 'antenna' Questions - Page 5
Serial code aNTENNA 24/26 GHz 09M SINGLE - LEAX Arkivator Telecom
TP-LINK TL-ANT2406A SPECIFICATIONS Pdf Download. Once the ARS-USB Interface is connected into a USB Port (Windows, Linux or MAC OS X) a serial/COM port is added to the computer (Example: COM5). Radiation Performance Analysis of 28 GHz Antennas. It achieves more than 11-dBi gain and about 15 dB impedance matching across the full 4.2-to-4.4-GHz radio-altimeter band. In this paper feeding element and matching line is used to design the 4 X 1 micro strip patch antenna array.
Serial key antenna Test Lab Example Reports Gallery Of Antenna
Male offspring demonstrated decreased learning and memory, while females were not affected in learning and memory, which suggested that microwaves had gender-dependent effects. The actual number of bytes sent by nRF24L01 is 32, the bytes available to users are 1-31, and the 0th byte is reserved by the system for statistics on the packet length of each transmission: for example, the serial port sends "abcd" (ASCII code, 4 bytes), 4abcd in actual transmission (the 0th byte is 4), and the receiving end should judge the length of the received data packet according to the. The antenna A is the initial design for the proposed antenna at 28 GHz. Antenna theory and design: by Warren L. Stutzman and Gary. Their low profile design, often square or rectangular, allows them to be mounted to flat surfaces.
Keygen embedded antenna apparatus for utility metering
The developed radar system consists of transceiver, two selectable transmit antennas, eight parallel receive antennas, and a back-end module for data logging and to control the transceiver. The operation band of the proposed antenna ranges from 24 GHz to 39 GHz. The return loss and the various gain plots have been studied along with the radiation patterns. Micro strip line feed and matching line are used to design series Micro strip patch antenna array. This memorandum contains two compilations of antenna parameters.
|1||Radar Sensors Put To The Test||47%|
|2||Evaluation of radome effects on the radiation properties||82%|
|3||FOUR-BEAM ANTENNA ARRAY FOR 24 GHz APPLICATIONS FED BY 4 x||27%|
|4||Design and Test of: Wide Band and Highly Polarized Antenna||98%|
|5||Piezomagnetic Trick Shrinks 2.5 GHz Antennas||31%|
|6||Are EMFs Harmful? The Science on Health Effects of EMFs||11%|
Long Range WiFi Antenna
An L-shaped stub is attached to the ground plane to achieve an additional band from 2.45 GHz to 2.52 GHz for WLAN applications. Developing Code, Algorithms and Ecosystems that creates a secondary digital brain inside the brains of all human beings that can prevent the person from recognizing that they are being controlled, and bypassing any biological resistance to AI Control or human bodies innate capability to resist the formation of a symbiotic and parasitical relationships with AI software and cybernetic. If this beam points towards the earth, it can then be observed with a large dish or directional antenna and a radio, like the RTL-SDR. Step 2 Connect the two WiFi 2.4/5 GHz Antennas to the antenna connectors. PROPOSED ANTENNA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT A. Single Microstrip Patch Antenna Working at 28 GHz, microstrip patch antenna one of ideal solution for cost sensitive radio applications because of small size, low profile, simplicity of coordination and ease of integration in portable wireless devices .
SIERRA WIRELESS AIRCARD 597E USER MANUAL Pdf Download
Bayonet connection for radio units. Esi 24 emf detector is equipped with internal hf-antenna discover more. Most routers are not turned off at night, so you are exposed 24/7.
- ANTENNA 24/26 GHz 06M DUAL - LEAX Arkivator Telecom
- (PDF) Design and Development of a 2.4 GHz Slot Antenna
- GNSS Receivers, Introduction
- Inexpensive Millimeter-Wave Communication Channel Using
- L0101 LINK 100 User Manual TomTom LINK 105 TomTom
- Online Calculator .:. HB9CV Antenna Calculator
- Amazon.com: 5 dBi WiFi Extended Magnetic Antenna Omni
- Ninano Electromagnetic Blocking Network Antenna Cap (Orange)
- 24 GHz Active Phased Array Antenna for Microwave Sensors
- Design and Implementation of 24 GHz Multichannel FMCW
24GHz Microwave module radar Antenna sensor Doppler
The design and simulation of patch antennas is widely used in mobile cellular phones today, and our emphasis in this work is on optimization of a GHz rectangular Microstrip patch antenna. This live video transmission, along with high quality cameras, allow drones to be used in many positive ways across numerous sectors. Larry Berg And The Purple Open Passion Project. So we're talking about non-thermal, non-ionizing radio frequencies here. WPAN, ISM, and LoRaWan.
Video door intercom and video doorbell for iOS, Android
Additionally, a far field analysis of the launching radiation patterns led to the definition of the antenna dimensions in terms of optimal power coupling. GHz Antenna Radiation Patterns. WiFi (2.4GHz) Dipole Antenna - 2.15dBi. Application note: CRC Implementation (Rev. Document Includes User Manual 2.4GHz Antenna Manual.
[Remote Neural Monitoring] Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence by John J. McMurtrey, M. S
(This paper was written in 2003.)
People discerning remote manipulation by technology capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the world.    Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of these technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of 'hearing voices' and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being presumptuous, without appraisal of the evidence.
Herein is substantiated:
- Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.
- Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covert development, and remote EEG capture technology.
- References to the use of these, or similar technologies against humans.
The first American[c]  to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey in 1962, yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II. Deaf and normal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter. Transmitter parameters above those producing the effect result in a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parameters below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant of loudness, though there is some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre. The effect "is the most easily and reliably replicated of low power density (microwave) illumination."  Review of human and animal microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators of the effect establishes validity.     Designs for scaring birds away from aircraft or other hazards by microwave hearing and induction of vertigo exist. 
While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Sharp and Grove discovered "receiverless" and "wireless" voice transmission.  Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery's applications are "obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine" according to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications.
A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. The report states, "Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities."  Among microwave weapon implications are "great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel." An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of "camouflage, decoy, and deception operations."  "One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created" quotes the report.
The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 "Hearing system" is a device capable of verbal microwave hearing.  The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolic antenna with indication of direct microwave influence on neural activity. The microwave spectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential to perception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity by their amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is patented, with ranges of pulse and burst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at 100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration. Another patent application based on microwave bursts is "designed in such a way that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone," though the transducer here is not remote.
Stocklin Patent # 4858612 "Hearing device" 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect. Stocklin gives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials. Microwaves are considered both emitted and absorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain perhaps by influencing calcium, a central ion in nerve firing. Stocklin represents the auditory cortex as normally producing microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus eliciting sound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by a formula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements. Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibrate the device. The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwave speech transmission in this patent is unremote with the antenna over and sized for the auditory cortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing.  
Descriptions in the above patents attribute microwave hearing to direct neural influence. However, the most accepted mechanism in review is by thermoelastic expansion,12 most likely inducing bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be involved, but not the middle ear.14 This divergence of mechanism illustrates the non-thermal/thermal controversy. US exposure standards are based on thermal effects, yet there are effects very difficult to explain by thermodynamics.13  All accept thermal effects at some level, yet the thermal only school is rather dogmatic related to liability issues of commercial and national security concern. It must be said that the open literature regarding microwave hearing indicates a thermo-acoustic mechanism.
"Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect." is the title of a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: "The feasibility of the concept has been established" using both low and high power systems. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as to the project's outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure "could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security."  Though the Air Force denied the FOIA disclosure, such a contract's purpose is elaborated by the Air Force's "New World Vistas" report: "It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."  Robert Becker, whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biological electromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: "Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with "voices" or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin." 
The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a military instruction website.18 The military thesaurus entry lists analogous devices using "silent sound." [d] 
ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE
Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 "Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier" clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or directed at an individual. Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the directional quality of sound perception. "Since most cultures attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions", quotes the Lowrey patent's effect on people. Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which "may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort." This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 "Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness", with license to Interstate Industries and involves an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.
Norris Patent # 5889870 "Acoustic heterodyne device and method", directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams. The cancellation leaves the carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface.
American Technology Corporation, which licensed this patent, has an acoustic non-lethal weapons technology, a cooperative agreement with the Army Research & Development Command, and is working with numerous other government agencies. The corporation's Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) account for 60% of military sales, and have integration into the Navy's situational awareness & radar surveillance systems with deployment on naval vessels and fleet harbors. A popular magazine writer describes the device's inner nature of sound perception. From separate references, non-lethal weapons treatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation with obvious lack of nearby discernment; the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. A similar ultrasound method of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight is marketed, with exhibition at Boston's Museum of Science and the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum. Both the American Technology device and Audio Spotlight are discussed in an article with some history of ultrasound acoustics, which has origins in sonar. Other acoustic influence methods may utilize ultrasound.[e] 
TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY
The maintenance of effects on people requires obstacle penetration and target tracking. These internal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Sound transmission through enclosures is commonly experienced. An inaudible ultrasound high intensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which is being developed to discern movement through walls. Common technology utilizes the microwave hearing spectrum, which partly or completely encompasses cell phone,  TV, and radar frequencies.  Commercial signals are not perceived, since the hearing effect requires pulsation within the limits that elicit perception. A variety of antennae localize the structurally penetrating microwave illumination with collimation or focusing.  A patent, "compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs," (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modified Luneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.
Hablov Patent # 5448501 "Electronic life detection system" is for microwave radar within the hearing spectrum that finds and distinguishes individuals through obstruction. Therein is stated: "the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . . . forms a type of "electronic fingerprint" of the living being with characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings." Though this patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 "Electronic surveillance system" detects interlopers with security emphasis. Other literature describes the basic method.
The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures by vital organ motion, but others offer more detailed imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 "System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array" is such a design, and is commercially available as RadarVision by Time Domain.  Further designs for imaging within structures include: a portable system determining suspect distance, and presentations by the International Society for Optical Engineering.  Software for displaying radar detection on a personal computer is sold.
Rowan Patent # 4893815 "Interactive transector device commercial and military grade" describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets. Stated therein: "Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained." The capability of "isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group" is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. Another target tracking system is the Manportable Surveillance and Target Acquisition Radar by Systems & Electronics, Inc., which is capable of tracking moving targets including personnel. This system has an auto target track feature, and lists moving target detection as 12 km for a walking man.
A track initiation processor acquires a target, while a data association filter maintains a tracking lock on the target. An original method for target tracking is the Kalman filter. Numerous weapons guidance examples utilize similar processes and illuminate targets for tracking. Laser illumination is also used for non-human targets. Other examples utilize microwave beam target recognition and weapons guidance.  Target illumination tracking systems have nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses do not require a wide scan area to lock illumination upon persons at achievable speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch in a microsecond.
Ultrasound voice transmission technology is publicly demonstrated in museum exhibits. The numerous microwave voice transmission citations rest on a considerable foundation of microwave hearing literature. Internal voice non-lethal weapon applications are discussed in many of the citations. There are are examples of either existence or sales of non-lethal weapons based on both technologies. Numerous designs involving human location, identification, and tracking methods, have long demonstrated the feasibility of constructing devices capable of producing internal voice continuously in isolated individuals. To deny such technological capabilities in the face of extensive complaint is willfully to ignore documented development of the relevant technologies and engineering competence for complete integration.
THOUGHT READING CAPACITY
Many people who report experiencing remote behavioral influence also perceive mind reading. Thought reading capacity, or brain wave analysis word recognition, is seriously reported. Publications by a Stanford group support and report recognition of specific words from brain waves,    with recent enhanced success.  Other investigators publish above chance magnetoencephalographic (MEG) word recognition. The current publications lack reference to a 1975 US government technical report of prior results from Stanford comparable to the recent articles, and an apparent Russian report of specific EEG word recognition before 1981. Electroencephalographic (EEG) instant detection by syllables of "a content of category which the testee wishes to speak" quotes Kiyuna et. al. Patent # 5785653 "System and method for predicting internal condition of live body."  A stated use: "the present invention may be use (sic) to detect the internal condition of surveillance in criminal investigation" by EEG. NEC Corporation licensed this patent. Remote EEG communication with Armed Forces or clandestine application are the cited uses for Mardirossian Patent # 6011991 "Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity."  This patent affirms EEG word recognition, proposes transmitter capable skin implants, utilizes neural networks (artificial intelligence), and is licensed by Technology Patents, LLC.
Activation of brain cell assemblies provides a theoretical framework for the above word recognition reports, and extensive publications of averaged EEG word category differentiation. These differentiation reports themselves are consistent with specific word recognition, since their basis is by visual analysis of averaged categories, without the use of sophisticated computer programs as are essential for specific word recognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words can be differentiated as to length,  and visual nouns can be differentiated from action verbs.     Brain wave patterns distinguish proper names from common nouns,  animal names from numerals, or content from function words.    Face, arm, or leg action verbs are reported distinguished by brain waves as well.  Concrete versus abstract words, and unambiguous versus ambiguous noun/verbs have distinctive EEG patterns.
Some of these word category differentiation reports are consistent with both the specific recognition reports, and/or the differentiation of non-verbal cognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words are readily distinguished from non-words,   or pictures. EEG differentiation of words rated as to affective meaning such as good-bad, strong-weak, or active-passive is reported. 
Other literature indicates EEG differentiation of completely non-verbal cognition. Emotion differentiation by EEG is patented, referencing Air Force research. Movement anticipation potentials (bereitschaftspotential) and those of actual movement are detectable by EEG.  EEG movement signals have been used to move a cursor left or right, and just the imagination of movement is sufficiently distinguished by EEG to control switches, or control prosthesis grasp. Guiding robots through simulated rooms by EEG detection of imagining the spinning of cubes or arm rising of appropriate direction is reported.   Even more complex grasping and reaching robot arm control has been achieved by signals from implanted brain electrodes in monkeys without body arm movement. A number of groups have developed procedures to detect deception based on the P300 (positive @ 300 millisec.) event related potential (ERP) from EEG.      A commercial system, Brain Fingerprinting, which includes analysis of a late negative ERP potential and frequency analysis in addition to the P300, even asserts 100% accuracy over five separate studies.     [f]
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies also report differentiation of cognitive states. Different fMRI brain activation loci for face, natural and manufactured object recognition are reviewed. Neural network differentiation of fMRI response to noun categories for fish, four legged animals, trees, flowers, fruits, vegetables, family members, occupations, tools, kitchen items, dwellings, and building parts is reported. Distinguishing truthful from deceptive responses by fMRI is also reported.    The ability to discern the state of romantic love towards an individual by fMRI has report as well.
The research arm of agencies with missions to covertly acquire information would certainly develop to operational capability any technologic thought reading potential. Assertions that such development has progressed are multiple, and two are confirmed by details of the 1975 government EEG specific word recognition report, which itself is evidence of development covert to open databases.83 An International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium synopsis states EEG computer mind reading development by Lawrence Pinneo in 1974 at Stanford. A letter by the Department of Defense Assistant General Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs, Robert L. Gilliat in 1976 affirmed brain wave reading by the Advanced Research Projects Agency. "Thought reading or synthetic telepathy" communications technology procurement is considered in a 1993 Jane's[g] Special Operations Forces (SOF) article: "One day, SOF commandos may be capable of communicating through thought processes."  Descriptive terms are "mental weaponry and psychic warfare" Although contemplated in future context, the availability of a technology without adaptation to troop level requirements is implied, since anticipation of mobile deployment would have to assume prior development.
In 1976, the Malech Patent # 3951134 "Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves" was granted. Example of operation is at 100 and 210 MHz; frequencies penetrating obstruction. "The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar"; and "The system permits medical diagnosis of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations" are quotes indicating remote capacity. License is to Dorne & Margolin Inc., but now protection is expired with public domain. The Malech patent utilizes interference of 210 and 100 MHz frequencies resulting in a 110 MHz return signal, which is demodulated to give EEG waveform.
The capability of remote EEG is predicted by electromagnetic scattering theory using ultrashort pulses, which are not part of the Malech patent. Ultrashort pulses are currently defined in the range of 10-12 to 10-15 second. Considering that EEG word elicited potentials are comparatively long (hundreds of milliseconds), indicates that remote radar EEG capture is adequate to word recognition, with ultrashort pulses allowing some 109 or more radar reflections in a millisecond (10-3 sec.)
The possibility of impressing an 'experience set' on an individual by ultrashort pulses is also contemplated.143 The above patent can alter brain waves as well as detect them. Microwave non-lethal weapon brain wave disruption and behavioral change including unconsciousness are known.35
The above EEG telemetry patent and ultrashort pulse method are by active radar probe. Yet a passive field extends as far as 12 feet from man as detected by a cryogenic antenna. A technical article maintains this device as entirely adaptable to clandestine applications, and pointedly comments on the disappearance of physiological remote sensing literature since the 1970's for animals and humans, while all other categories of remote sensing research greatly expanded.
Complete rejection of assertions of a remote mind reading capability is just as presumptuous, in the face of complaints, as has been the dismissal of internal voice capacity. Considerable capacity to detect and differentiate mental states is evident from literature reports particularly by EEG. The fact that EEG movement imagination signals are detected for robot guidance on a voluntary unprompted basis116 117 118 suggests a similar capacity is feasible for specific EEG word identification, which has only been reported for word prompted responses. Though references to remote EEG are less, they provide plausibly exploitable mechanisms, which may be covertly developed.
LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES TO BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES
References to behavioral influence weapon use by government bodies and international organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of microwave weapon nervous system effects. European Parliament passage of resolutions calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of "weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings"  includes neuro-influence capability. A resolution relates to HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, which has environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency, ionospheric extra low frequencies (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence whole populations.  President Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, predicted development of such capacity. Nature News reports concern by a French government panel about the potential for thought reading and such a remote capacity. An American draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using electromagnetic, psychotronic (behavioral influence), and sound technologies "directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control" has not yet passed. Russian electromagnetic standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the West, so their weapon law forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department parameters is strict. The Russian draft law explicitly references behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, and development in several countries. Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, though largely relevant to use against infrastructure.
MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS
The microwave irradiation of the American Embassy in Moscow received little publicity until the winter of 1976 instillation of protective screening, but irradiation was known since 1953.34 Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping[h] consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Complaint to the Soviets had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 "reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings."  A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988. Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable, and comparison with other Soviet Bloc posts.159 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the purpose of the irradiation. He concluded the Russians "believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel."  In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20% 140
The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England, who prompted investigation of unusual symptoms. Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.160 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.160 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; 'severe' headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome 160 It has also been reported that some of the women 'heard voices.' The base closed finally in 1991.
Criminal directed energy weapon use has been reported in Germany. In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.) Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.164
Measurement of non-ionizing radiation fields in the vicinity of an Australian victim is described. The intensity ranged from 7 mV in an adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. The victim suffered from multiple personality disorder attributed to ritual abuse, and claimed an implant with radiological evidence.
Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is cited  The device could focus on one person; and utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented. It was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as 'spooky.' More detail by a defense journalist is quoted: "When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else."  British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.160
Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal.
The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski[i] of the appearance of a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values is compelling.153 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim's perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: domestic adversaries; security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; persons witnessing serious improprieties; and those prone to committing advantageous felonies. Legality is readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency situation), which can be sealed, and this prerogative is only accountable to co-equal branches of government as is now the case with terrorism suspects. Internal voice technology is most applicable within the same language and culture. Space here limits more than mention of remote EEG influence capacity, hypnosis, and footnoting remote subliminal technique. Hypnotic or subliminal message presentation represent particularly insidious means of influencing thought, mood, behavior, and undermining civil liberties.
Most complainants allege public sector involvement or sub-contracted private companies. Remote behavioral influence research has long been funded by the US,39 with evidence of development19 22 36 45 46 and weapons,18 44 47 48 51 though denying on national security grounds project results37 and foreign literature analyses. Some thirty countries evidence active behavioral influence weapon research.
Though there is some scant psychoanalytical acknowledgement, current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the afflicted. Not all those affected are stigmatized. However phenomena of 'hearing voices', or perception of remote manipulation, when recounted to health professionals results in various stigmatizing diagnoses,   totally without investigation. Determination of relevant fields around complainants is mandatory, or abatement by proven shielding of such phenomena. Professional opinions formed without excluding these technologies are negligent.
The medical community has long heard either identical or similar complaint to that above delineated as known internal voice technology from numerous victims. This fact indicts the scholarship and presumption of impossibility evident in the pertinent medical literature. In addition, microwave bioeffects have considerable congruence with reported symptoms of major psychosis other than 'voices.'  All of society should be disturbed at the prospect of technologic induction of voice, since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural thought, without such an assault as to provoke complaint.
It is difficult to deny the level of substantiation for the possibility that a thought reading capacity exists, even with references that support a remote basis. The logic that in the thirty years since the Pinneo work started, this capability has had full development is too sound to dismiss victim corroboration. It would have to be admitted that funding for projects by the defense and security agencies is considerably greater than for open science, and that thought reading would be a priority area. Educated democracies should not be complacent at this prospect, given the potential for political control, and existence of a remote EEG method in the public domain.
Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, and a benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support. There is gratitude also to Dr. Paul Canner, and Dr. Allen Barker for their suggestions.
All patents are printable from the U. S. Patent Office website. EEG word recognition articles are printable thru Pubmed as designated. Each is free.
Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. "Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System" is available from Christians Against Mental Slavery at [email protected].
[a] Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email- [email protected] Phone- 410-539-5140. [b] Financial contribution to this article was made by fellow members of Christians Against Mental Slavery. [c] American discovery may not be the first. Soviet and East European electromagnetic bioeffect literature is prior, more extensive, and transparent. A translated Russian treatment is the next text reference, which refers to F. Cazzamalli, an Italian, who mentioned radiofrequency hallucination about 1920. [d] Also called S-quad, Silent Sounds, Inc. licensed Lowery Patent #5159703 "Silent subliminal presentation system", and has advanced brain wave entrainment technology (vide infra) with several classified patents. (See http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htm and links.) Unessential is individual direction, but possible by ultrasound. [e] Loos Patent # 6017302 "Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system" can "cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near ½ Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation." [f] Referred to, but unavailable, however are a CIA Office of Technology Assessment report, a security industry publication, and a doctoral dissertation. [g] Jane's is the most respected and authoritative of defense reporting services. [h] A means evading detection. [i] National Security Advisor to President Carter.
Footnotes in comments below.
Possibly switching to a X570 Gigabyte from an ASUS X470 Crosshair VII Hero
Build Help:Have you read the sidebar and rules? (Please do) Yes, I have read the rules on the side panel.
I've been having problems with my current ASUS X470 Crosshair VII Hero (Non-WiFi) and had recently purchased a Gigabyte X570 AORUS Master as it was the only motherboard I could find with a reasonable price and also in stock with availability to be shipped ASAP. I am in grad school in a weird 5-week session, program year-round, and I need to have a working, reliable PC (I'm also required to have Windows 10 and Office 365 - so I'm stuck with that option). I've narrowed the choice down to this board though I may be able to squeeze a processor upgrade in the next few weeks, but would rather wait until later this year or early next year. I also have some faster memory on hand already, but it can be returned so I'm open to suggestions.
I use this rig for everything from programming, to academic research, to overclocking, to gaming (though not as much in the past few years), to video and photo editing, with heavy multitasking and general use.
So, I've got a decent amount of memory to handle everything I throw at it. The processor seems to be great; however, these weird idiosyncrasies with my motherboard have just been too much to handle. As my daily driver, I don't keep it overclocked. It sits at 4.0GHz to 4.1GHz stock with XMP/DOCP enabled, and I just let it do its thing. However, it likes to decide to stop recognizing my ethernet card that is integrated into the board randomly. The fix is to shut it down, flip the switch on the PSU off, unplug the cable, give it no less than 30 seconds to disperse any energy completely, and then you're able to boot it back up, and it works just like new. I did end up getting an AX PCIe x1 adapter shortly after the first time it happened, so I'm not necessarily stuck with that issue, though the mobo hates the BT on it, so it's flippant about letting me use it.
Sometimes after rebooting it though, newer files and programs you just worked on may have disappeared afterward. There was also a great time I had where it backed up 1.25TB over the course of 18 hours to a 2TB HDD and then decided to crash at around the 46% and 18 hours mark. So, I thought maybe my Thermaltake Riing Quads are draining too much power from my 850W overkill PSU even when I have the 24, 8, and 4 pins plugged into the mobo. I know the 4 pin isn't necessary, but I don't want to find out what happens when it is. I only had one set of fans installed at the time as my only three fans + rear + stock AMD cooler. The CPU has never hit anything above 84℃; the GPU never gets above 64℃ staying at max boost clock.
I don't know. I can't tell if it's the memory controllers, the fact that there may be some issues since my DIMMs aren't on the QVL - at least not at the time I checked it - but it's so outdated anyway, and I flashed the BIOS before installing the CPU to the latest update just to be sure it would work. I just can't have a series of kernel errors, NVIDIA errors thrown when I'm doing nothing but sitting in front of it texting on my phone, or the nice Logitech webcam drivers causing kernel crashes unexpectedly. I have spent the entirety of May troubleshooting and research my logs, but it happens so suddenly, most of the logs just say kernel error, BSOD for a few hours, and then say "system shutdown unexpectedly".
Now, I just need some advice on whether it could just be Windows 10 Pro? Could it be the motherboard? The memory? A conflict with the GPU? The past two weeks have been - knock on wood - great, as I tend to shut it down as often as every 6-8 hours throughout the day. I also work from home (pre-pandemic as well), so I'm on it for 18 hours a day, all the time. I do have other laptops and desktops to back me up, so I'm not SoL, but I need a reliable board.
I managed to find an actually reasonably priced, "checks all my boxes", "will do everything I need it to do", and will "future proof me for long enough" motherboard with the Gigabyte X570 AORUS Master. It seems like a solidly build board, will do everything I need it to do, and I got a discount as well on top of it, despite it being the only X570 I could find at the prepandemic price even though it's about 60 bucks more than I was willing to part with. I did get an 256GB NVMe PCIe Gen 3.0 to go with it which made it the original MSRP after the discount I was able to swing. So, despite it being a great deal, money is still tight right now and I'm just worried about the compatibility of a 2700X being able to carry the load of an X570 with better DIMMs to replace the ones I have, though not trying to overclock anything until I can upgrade to a CPU that can handle those 4000+ speeds.
I would just like some feedback on what I can do with very limited resources, a non-existent graduate student budget, and any potential performance or compatibility issues I haven't been able find. I've got a budget of about $400 that I can work some magic to make happen. I just can't risk it not working out and not being able to get my refund on the motherboard. My plan was to test the mobo before installing everything and then deciding if my original RAM would be good enough since it doesn't overclock more than 3400 CL 16 with loose secondaries.
There's honestly also the problem of many other boards not having either not enough PCIe slots or USB ports in the IO that I am extremely limited in my choices, which is I thought the AORUS Master was such a great find since it also was fully featured and the VRM seemed solid enough for an 8-core Ryzen. I considered the B550s, but I don't think they're going to cut it, unless it's the top end boards for which I would be paying the same amount for in the end considering I only paid about $300 for this motherboard.
I live in the US, but I don't drive and am disabled, so I can't really leave the house to go across town to Microcenter. I'm pretty much limited to online scavenging at this point.
This is my current pcpartspicker list, with what I will be rebuilding it with below. This was mostly purchased between late January through late February-ish; however, I was snagging bits and pieces like HDDs a few months before that trying to breathe life into my old AM3+ rig. The CPU I don't want to upgrade until around September, but can swing it if need be. I won't be able to use PCIe 4.0 for awhile, so I'm not that worried about it. It is nice for future use though, but that won't be for a long time anyway. My only concern is to be able to future proof my socket through Zen3 to carry me through the next few years. I feel like the 2700X though is kind of at it's limit though with what I've been using it for and grumpy components.
PCPartPicker Part List
PCPartPicker Part List
Thank you in advance for any help and for reading my rambly, nervous, first post on reddit despite lurking for years on end. I do appreciate all of your conversations that have taught me a lot about building a pc, and sincerely thank everyone - even lurkers - for helping to educate me.
Sidenote: I am also wondering if there's an ATX case I may have missed that would be a great option for around the same price as the one I currently have. I was eyeing the Raijintek Thetis, Segotep Phoenix or Argus, and the Thermaltake Core G3 (slim) since they can support ATX and have a right side windows. I want to bathe in the glorious RGBling of my Disco Battle Station. Reusing my current motherboard for side projects and fun would be awesome. I could still get a lot of mileage out of it, I just need something more stable and reliable as my daily. If y'all could maybe point me in the direction of that as well. To be honest, I may just turn the InWin 309 upside down and throw a party.