Welcome to Our Website

Web hacker 0 4b firefox

Crack webSphere Portal V6.1.0.3 and V6.1.5.0 hardware and

Home; Top100; Disclaimer; Contact Us. Found 1 key generators. The culprit may lie in your Toolbars, and these instructions should help you isolate and eliminate it. It is useful for instant web app security assessment. Web hacker 0 4b firefox. Added Scratchpad, an interactive JavaScript prototyping.

640250 - Update pixman for Firefox 5

After upgrading the BIOS firmware to 4.0(4b), Cisco UCS M5 servers may lose the previously configured (before the upgrade) iSCSI attempts. RaspEX is a perfect Linux ARM system for Raspberry Pi 4, 3 B+ and 2. ABOUT RaspEX Build 200324 is a full Linux Desktop system with LXDE and many other useful programs pre-installed. Table 6 lists other software supported by Cisco Fabric Manager Release 5.0(4b). Available for all major desktop browsers and mobile devices. Tutorial showing how to enable hardware acceleration on Raspberry Pi 4 running Ubuntu MATE, including system configuration change, kms and fkms 3D drivers, video memory splitting, individual tweaks for Firefox, Chromium and VLC, some other tips and tricks, and more.


Hi all, I'm trying to add a new widget to a dashboard, I click the check mark to save the changes, and everything looks okay. Hackthebox Control writeup. 10 Best Web Browsers You Can Install on Your Raspberry Pi https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=347. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time. NEW - Full Screen APIs allow you to build a web application that runs full screen (see the feature page) NEW - CSS3 3D-Transforms are now supported (see bug 505115).

Activity code uninstall - Removing Firefox in Ubuntu with all add-ons

User Agent Strings - Firefox https://ya-pilot.ru/download/?file=362. Ahead Nero Crack, Serial & Keygen. No shady privacy policies or. GNU IceCat (formerly GNU IceWeasel) is a free and open-source version of the popular Firefox browser with the aim of encouraging the use of free software. Mozilla Firefox 4 Beta Release Notes.

Download Mozilla Firefox 10.0 (Beta 1) for Windows

Lay out all your devices on an interactive floorplan of your home for at-a-glance status and control. The problem still exists! Hacking Tool Extreme Collection! !! ! - Pro Hack. The Page Hacker button allows you to edit the currently viewed page, as in a text editor. Internet experience for our customers.

Serial number 560692 - Create style panel for web page inspector

A web crawler that is useful for grabbing all user supplied input related to a given website and will save the output. Add-ons provide additional functionality to your browser. First, make sure that Raspbian is completely up to date. Aruba Authentication Bypass / Insecure Transport / Tons Of Issues Posted May 6, 2020 Authored by Google Security Research, Sven Blumenstein. Genre WEAPONS 2.0 VIP Comment by Thai Anh Nguyen.

Hack tab Data for Firefox highlights memory usage of each open

Click Open Folder button to open your Firefox profile folder. Installing Firefox and Thunderbird on a Raspberry Pi. Visual Refresh: Firefox 2\'s theme and user interface have been updated to improve usability without altering the familiarity of the browsing experience. Highly converting ads. Download Latest Version (73.06 MB) Advertisement.

Firefox Browser fast & private 68.0 (Full) (Final) Apk

Ace Torrents signups Open; USB Utilities MegaPack [8 in 1] TorrentBytes (TB) increases user limit - 600 more. I have a retail Windows 10 license I want to transfer to my new pc. How can I untie it from my previous pc? If you have successfully installed Greasemonkey you will now get a dialog window popup asking you to confirm install of 'FPL get team info' 4c. If the file attempts to download instead of installing via Greasemonkey, then you didn't do parts 1-3 correctly. You can search for and switch to already open tabs in the Smart Location Bar * New Addons Manager and extension management API. New applications, compatibility with X, and related subprojects (such as making Mesa or the newly-released OpenGL SI not reliant on X) are priorities.

Help with filter to block inline-script

I'm trying to write a filter to block an inline script from running on a specific website. The inline script is used to trigger an anti adblock blocker. The script I'm trying to block looks like this:
eval(function(p,a,c,k,e,d){e=function(c){return(c35?String.fromCharCode(c+29):c.toString(36))};if(!''.replace(/^/,String)){while(c--){d[e(c)]=k[c]||e(c)}k=[function(e){return d[e]}];e=function(){return'\\w+'};c=1};while(c--){if(k[c]){p=p.replace(new RegExp('\\b'+e(c)+'\\b','g'),k[c])}}return p}(';k M=\'\',28=\'1U\';1D(k i=0;i<12;i++)M+=28.U(D.J(D.L()*28.F));k 2A=4,2u=49,2v=4h,2z=4i,32=B(t){k o=!1,i=B(){z(q.1g){q.33(\'2U\',e);E.33(\'1T\',e)}P{q.2S(\'2Y\',e);E.2S(\'21\',e)}},e=B(){z(!o&&(q.1g||4j.2G===\'1T\'||q.2K===\'3a\')){o=!0;i();t()}};z(q.2K===\'3a\'){t()}P z(q.1g){q.1g(\'2U\',e);E.1g(\'1T\',e)}P{q.2J(\'2Y\',e);E.2J(\'21\',e);k n=!1;2L{n=E.4l==4m&&q.24}2N(r){};z(n&&n.2M){(B a(){z(o)H;2L{n.2M(\'14\')}2N(e){H 4g(a,50)};o=!0;i();t()})()}}};E[\'\'+M+\'\']=(B(){k t={t$:\'1U+/=\',4n:B(e){k a=\'\',d,n,o,s,c,l,i,r=0;e=t.e$(e);1e(r>2;c=(d&3)<<4|n>>4;l=(n&15)<<2|o>>6;i=o&63;z(2Z(n)){l=i=64}P z(2Z(o)){i=64};a=a+V.t$.U(s)+V.t$.U(c)+V.t$.U(l)+V.t$.U(i)};H a},13:B(e){k n=\'\',d,l,s,c,r,i,a,o=0;e=e.1y(/[^A-4p-4q-9\\+\\/\\=]/g,\'\');1e(o>4;l=(r&15)<<4|i>>2;s=(i&3)<<6|a;n=n+O.S(d);z(i!=64){n=n+O.S(l)};z(a!=64){n=n+O.S(s)}};n=t.n$(n);H n},e$:B(t){t=t.1y(/;/g,\';\');k n=\'\';1D(k o=0;o4r&&e<4s){n+=O.S(e>>6|4t);n+=O.S(e&63|1z)}P{n+=O.S(e>>12|2t);n+=O.S(e>>6&63|1z);n+=O.S(e&63|1z)}};H n},n$:B(t){k o=\'\',e=0,n=4u=1C=0;1e(e4o&&n<2t){1C=t.19(e+1);o+=O.S((n&31)<<6|1C&63);e+=2}P{1C=t.19(e+1);2d=t.19(e+2);o+=O.S((n&15)<<12|(1C&63)<<6|2d&63);e+=3}};H o}};k a=[\'4e==\',\'3Y\',\'4d=\',\'4c\',\'4b\',\'4a=\',\'48=\',\'47=\',\'46\',\'45\',\'44=\',\'43=\',\'42\',\'41\',\'40=\',\'3Z\',\'4v=\',\'4f=\',\'4w=\',\'4P=\',\'4R=\',\'4S=\',\'4T==\',\'4U==\',\'4V==\',\'4W==\',\'4Q=\',\'4X\',\'4Z\',\'51\',\'52\',\'53\',\'54\',\'55==\',\'4Y=\',\'4O=\',\'4G=\',\'3W==\',\'4z=\',\'4A\',\'4B=\',\'4C=\',\'4D==\',\'4E=\',\'4y==\',\'4F==\',\'4H=\',\'4I=\',\'4J\',\'4K==\',\'4L==\',\'4M\',\'4x==\',\'3X=\'],p=D.J(D.L()*a.F),Y=t.13(a[p]),w=Y,X=1,W=\'#3D\',r=\'#3V\',g=\'#3p\',v=\'#3o\',R=\'\',b=\'3n 1D 3m 3k\',f=\'3j 3i 3h 3e 2w 3c 3b 3d. 3f 3s 3l 3I 3U 3T 3S.\',y=\'2i 3R 2w 3Q 3P 3O 2y 2l 2k 3N 2f\\\'s 3M a 3K 3H 3v.\',s=\'I 3G 3F. I 3E 3C 3B 2l 2k. 2i 2f 3z 3y.\',o=0,u=0,n=\'3t.3w\',l=0,Z=e()+\'.2n\';B h(t){z(t)t=t.1F(t.F-15);k o=q.2E(\'3x\');1D(k n=o.F;n--;){k e=O(o[n].1N);z(e)e=e.1F(e.F-15);z(e===t)H!0};H!1};B m(t){z(t)t=t.1F(t.F-15);k e=q.3A;x=0;1e(x15){k n=q.1c(\'2a\');n.j.1o=\'1R\';n.j.1w=\'1r\';n.j.11=\'1r\';n.j.T=\'-1l\';n.j.14=\'-1l\';q.K.67(n,q.K.2p[a]);n.1f(e);k i=q.1c(\'1p\');i.1m=\'2s\';i.j.1o=\'1R\';i.j.14=\'-1l\';i.j.T=\'-1l\';q.K.1f(i)}P{e.1m=\'2s\';q.K.1f(e)};l=6p(B(){z(e){t((e.1W==0),o);t((e.23==0),o);t((e.1J==\'37\'),o);t((e.1E==\'2g\'),o);t((e.1G==0),o)}P{t(!0,o)}},27)},1O:B(e,s){z((e)&&(o==0)){o=1;E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1B();E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1O=B(){H}}P{k y=t.13(\'6q\'),u=q.6r(y);z((u)&&(o==0)){z((2u%3)==0){k l=\'6s=\';l=t.13(l);z(h(l)){z(u.1Q.1y(/\\s/g,\'\').F==0){o=1;E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1B()}}}};k p=!1;z(o==0){z((2v%3)==0){z(!E[\'\'+M+\'\'].2B){k d=[\'6K==\',\'6J==\',\'6I=\',\'6G=\',\'6F=\'],m=d.F,r=d[D.J(D.L()*m)],a=r;1e(r==a){a=d[D.J(D.L()*m)]};r=t.13(r);a=t.13(a);i(D.J(D.L()*2)+1);k n=1X 1Y(),c=1X 1Y();n.1Z=B(){i(D.J(D.L()*2)+1);c.1N=a;i(D.J(D.L()*2)+1)};c.1Z=B(){o=1;i(D.J(D.L()*3)+1);E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1B()};n.1N=r;z((2z%3)==0){n.21=B(){z((n.11<8)&&(n.11>0)){E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1B()}}};i(D.J(D.L()*3)+1);E[\'\'+M+\'\'].2B=!0};E[\'\'+M+\'\'].1O=B(){H}}}}},1B:B(){z(u==1){k Q=2C.6b(\'2D\');z(Q>0){H!0}P{2C.5z(\'2D\',(D.L()+1)*27)}};k h=\'61==\';h=t.13(h);z(!m(h)){k c=q.1c(\'5t\');c.26(\'5s\',\'5r\');c.26(\'2G\',\'1h/5q\');c.26(\'1P\',h);q.2E(\'5o\')[0].1f(c)};5m(l);q.K.1Q=\'\';q.K.j.17+=\'N:1r !16\';q.K.j.17+=\'1t:1r !16\';k Z=q.24.23||E.38||q.K.23,p=E.59||q.K.1W||q.24.1W,a=q.1c(\'1p\'),X=e();a.1m=X;a.j.1o=\'2q\';a.j.14=\'0\';a.j.T=\'0\';a.j.11=Z+\'1q\';a.j.1w=p+\'1q\';a.j.2I=W;a.j.1V=\'5j\';q.K.1f(a);k d=\'5c 2y 5b 5a 5x\';d=d.1y(\'5l\',e());d=d.1y(\'5y\',e());k i=q.1c(\'1p\');i.1Q=d;i.j.1o=\'1R\';i.j.1A=\'1S\';i.j.14=\'1S\';i.j.11=\'5Y\';i.j.1w=\'5X\';i.j.1V=\'2m\';i.j.1G=\'.6\';i.j.2e=\'2j\';i.1g(\'5V\',B(){n=n.5U(\'\').5T().5S(\'\');E.2F.1P=\'//\'+n});q.1L(X).1f(i);k o=q.1c(\'1p\'),C=e();o.1m=C;o.j.1o=\'2q\';o.j.T=p/7+\'1q\';o.j.5A=Z-5L+\'1q\';o.j.5K=p/3.5+\'1q\';o.j.2I=\'#5J\';o.j.1V=\'2m\';o.j.17+=\'G-1n: "5H 5G", 1v, 1s, 1k-1j !16\';o.j.17+=\'5F-1w: 5E !16\';o.j.17+=\'G-1a: 5D !16\';o.j.17+=\'1h-1x: 1u !16\';o.j.17+=\'1t: 5C !16\';o.j.1J+=\'2R\';o.j.2X=\'1S\';o.j.5B=\'1S\';o.j.5v=\'2r\';q.K.1f(o);o.j.5I=\'1r 5M 5O -5Q 5W(0,0,0,0.3)\';o.j.1E=\'2W\';k w=30,Y=22,x=18,R=18;z((E.38<35)||(5N.11<35)){o.j.2T=\'50%\';o.j.17+=\'G-1a: 5n !16\';o.j.2X=\'5Z;\';i.j.2T=\'65%\';k w=22,Y=18,x=12,R=12};o.1Q=\'<36 j="1b:#6A;G-1a:\'+w+\'1H;1b:\'+r+\';G-1n:1v, 1s, 1k-1j;G-1M:6D;N-T:1d;N-1A:1d;1h-1x:1u;">\'+b+\'<2P j="G-1a:\'+Y+\'1H;G-1M:68;G-1n:1v, 1s, 1k-1j;1b:\'+r+\';N-T:1d;N-1A:1d;1h-1x:1u;">\'+f+\'<6e j=" 1J: 2R;N-T: 0.2V;N-1A: 0.2V;N-14: 29;N-2x: 29; 2h:6f 6o #6H; 11: 25%;1h-1x:1u;">


<2a 5k="V.j.1G=.9;" 62="V.j.1G=1;" 1m="\'+e()+\'" j="2e:2j;G-1a:\'+R+\'1H;G-1n:1v, 1s, 1k-1j; G-1M:2o;2h-5P:2r;1t:1d;5R-1b:\'+g+\';1b:\'+v+\';1t-14:2b;1t-2x:2b;11:60%;N:29;N-T:1d;N-1A:1d;" 5p="E.2F.5w();">\'+s+\'
\'}}})();E.2Q=B(t,e){k n=6w.6x,o=E.6y,a=n(),i,r=B(){n()-a

The script contains the string "banner_ad" which is used to dynamically create an html element called banner_ad when it activates and modifies the web page. The filter I wrote looks like this:
But this filter does not seem to be working. According to the github wiki page there is a minimum version of uBlock Origin and FireFox I need to be running, and I made sure that both meet the requirements and are up to date.
I tried a few different strings to block on but non of them seem to have any effect. Here's some additional details:
  • FireFox 62.0.3 (64-bit)
  • uBlock Origin 1.17.0
  • No other ad blocking extensions installed
  • Web page that contains the script: http://tokyoghoulre.net/tokyo-ghoul-season-4-episode-2-subbed/
submitted by HaveYouSeenMyWiener to uBlockOrigin

Fido U2F and WebAuthn fail to prevent DNS attack + other major privacy backdoors

1a) Phishing Protection Backdoor: Upon login, browser supposed to check URL and send that origin to device to protect user from phishing, the problem is that there are 2 major types of phishing/man in the middle attack- DNS hacking and typo squatting. The current implementation only prevents typosquatting (which can also be prevented by bookmarking/extensions).
In the documents everywhere ‘origin’ seems to be the URL and not ip address, this makes any U2F device not useful against DNS hacking at all. Hacking DNS is much more difficult attack than mailing people with fake ‘your paypal is hacked! click here to go to papal.scam’; however recently even Google DNS, world’s most powerful organization has been hacked last year. Google lost access to 30% of it’s DNS for 1 hour and multiple website including cryptocurrency wallets were hacked/phished. Russian and North Korean hacking methods are getting sophisticated every year.
To prevent this all browsers just have to agree that from a specific date they will send ip address as origin instead of domain name. Websites have a static ip or in case of Google they have a range of ip addresses which can not be hacked by hackers. When Google sees their ip address/range is inside the signature as origin they will approve login. This is not Yubikey’s fault this is u2f’s fault, Yubico just have to voice it’s concern to so firefox/chrome will fix this u2f backdoor.
Some may claim AppID and handle mechanism alleviates the threat of DNS attack for most cases, however it does not, I will explain this later.
1b) Browser DNS table: Major browsers must have a ip address table for top thousand websites, that way they can warn the user that the DNS ip doesn’t match with their own ip lookup table which is signed by developers. This will clearly eliminates most DNS vulnerability.
Google is supposed to release a URL spell checking extension to prevent typo squatting, why not prevent DNS attack and eliminate phishing attack from hackers playbook altogether? I want native browser support but for now somebody should make an extension for DNS safety.
1c) Advanced DNS attack: The method I described won’t protect browsers from very sophisticated DNS attack like ip masking, so I recommend all browsers having a big database of public keys of top 1000 websites so if web data can be decrypted by public key it ought to be coming from legit website. This will kill 100% of DNS attack. Right now major browsers trust DNS too much for their own good. ISP DNS can be hacked at any moment, sometimes ISP even realizing it until it’s too late.
2a) AppID and handle against DNS attack: AppID and handle does not properly fight against compromised DNS, here is why. Fake server logs into server with id and password, takes the handle from server then sends it back to browser and device. The device, having no way of knowing that it is interacting with fake server will send it the real signature and thus will compromise one of the user accounts. There is no way this appID specific handle can fight against a sophisticated DNS attack, there is no alternative to ip tracing.
2b) Websites violating anonymity: If a website guesses who you are depending on VPN/TOR or pc configuration, it can give you wrong appID and handle intentionally to see if user can login (and linking user to multiple accounts on same server). There are ways to fight this problem- browser can be self aware and grab the username (or appID) and send it to device or there could be extensions to do so (how lastpass grabs data from web and android apps).
3a) Yubikey’s Major Privacy Backdoor: According to this blog many Yubikey devices send a device id to browsers each time they are turned on by touch, that’s a privacy backdoor and completely undermines the fact Fido protocol worked hard to protect anonymity through appID handles. Turning on the device multiple times while browsing a website, accidentally or deliberately, will reveal most identifiable information about the users. https://hackernoon.com/avoid-leaking-your-identity-with-yubikey-92539b6608a
I suggest having future Yubikey to touch the device for longer than 5 second in order to turn it on and send identification code to software/web. For the time being Yubico should immediately instruct Yubikey users to turn off OTP protocol on the device unless they are using OTP for a login.
3b) Detailed Data Log: Can somebody show us a detailed documentation of every bytes of data Yubikey 4 and 5 sends/receives for u2f and webauthn registration and login? So far I have only seen sequential diagram which is good for illustrating concept but not good enough for data analysis. Yubikey demo site shows the data which are being exchanged under protocol but it doesn’t show all transferred data.
3c) Yubikey is not open source anymore, that can be a problem in long run. A handful of engineers on twitter have voiced their support for alternative u2f brands. To be fair, Yubikey is now using proprietary chipsets, as off market arduino/arm style chips are not 100% trustable.
3d) AppID and handle table data limit: Yubikey manual claimed an older fido security key or Yubikey 4 can save UNLIMITED login credential. how is that even possible…. Oh wait, Yubikey manual says it doesn’t have to maintain a lookup table for this, it has advanced salt-decryption methods to dynamic key pairs. SO IGNORE THIS https://developers.yubico.com/U2F/Protocol_details/Key_generation.html
4a) Fail to protect cloning: Apparently websites don’t check clone counter at all, and google u2f keys are made in China which allegedly creates backdoor in devices. Yubico should pressure websites to check for cloned device, and the fact that their factory is in western countries is gonna give them more positive limelight and help expanding business. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3zgrQyxUtA
4b) Many sites have pathetically poor fallback: Many sites have option to fallback to OTP through SMS or even single factor password login when you claim you lost your u2f device. This is dangerous and services must have to be pressurized. Some websites don’t even have the option to install multiple u2f device for one user, potentially creating huge risk.
We know OTP is weak so websites should either be using u2f or at least send email back to email address which is protected by u2f. The problem is many websites don’t have the configuration to send emails for each login attempts, the websites that do that are mainly gaming software like steam and uplay. Mail providers and Fido should push websites to support verification email feature.
4c) What is the difference between firefox’s and chrome’s u2f. Yubico claimed different browsewebsite can implement fido u2f differently but I thought u2f or webauthn protocols had to be identical, it’s fido or fido2 ‘principle’ which can allow flexible implementation. Should Yubico pressure browsers and email providers to standardize protocols? Why does Firefox not support registration with Yubikey device? Is it because Yubikey can not save appID handles in a table? There is no firefox u2f documentation in Mozilla website, why?
4d) SIM cloning: Cellphone carriers don’t check for Sim cloning, just like website developers. Sim cloning is getting popular among hackers as many youtube hacker conferences are claiming. We should push carriers to check for counters in SIM.
5a) Microsoft’s webauthn is not multifactor: Microsoft’s webauthn login supports passwordless login through extension where user’s device actually have to save login credential inside it with a 4 digit pin. This is good for protecting anonymity because you don’t need to insert your email but it’s not 2 factor, you can either use yubikey device (or any fingerprint device if you select fingerprint option) or you can login with just password. So if lastpass database gets hacked Microsoft accounts still will be in trouble because password doesn’t require any second factor.
This is problematic specially if other smaller companies start to implement single factor login, they are prone to password database leaks and Yubikey will be useless to prevent hacking.
5b) Multi appID/handle login with Microsoft: How can I have multiple Microsoft mail address set to use one device? Is the system like- dial 1234 to login directly to l33t_1, dial 9876 to login to l33t_2? Explain please. According to this, Microsoft is updating their fido2 policy, please pressure them to support multi user and multi factor login system like Google does. https://www.reddit.com/yubikey/comments/ajuntg/will_the_yubikey_for_windows_hello_app_eve
6a) Off topic- Email providers fails against phishing: Some major email providers don’t provide proper phishing protection. I know they can not legally read all our emails but they can read subject lines and email id, so why don’t they protect us from paypal phishing mail? Some of the paypal phishing getting more and more difficult to detect, like
https://blog.malwarebytes.com/cybercrime/2016/06/advanced-phishing-tactics-used-to-steal-paypal-credentials/ (careful one of the links inside this article is malware)
These advanced phishers have somehow inserted secret javascript into merchant websites to get password, and some of them are using UTF-8 Non-English fonts in the address bar which look like English font. Somebody make a good extension to protect us, it should warn us/prevent us from going into non English URL, and should have a list of top 5000 websites.
6b) Physical verification: .Com domain name registry should require owner to physically go into domain registry office and verify identity, this way typosquatting can be completely eliminated when combined with proper URL checking extension.
6c) Partial u2f/PGP on all websites: Hypothetically, in future somebody who has some issues is the president of a powerful country and he or she reads news/blogs/twitter everyday without logging into the sites. This can lead enemies to commit man in the middle attack on the websites to persuade the president into doing something erratic. In future can we expect all servers to send partial news/information in PGP encryption, PGP enabled Yubikey will detect encrypted information inside xml tags and will unencrypt to somewhat verify the website content using public key which will be available from browser developers.
6d) Futuristic Distopia: Following previous point, in future man in the middle attack will be very common and browser security will fail, u2f devices have to work as the decryptor for everything. Take this example- one of the routers in the submarine cable/IIG has a malware, website sends appID and handle to the browser and the malware just watches(it doesn’t want to compromise the ‘origin’), however after u2f device sends signature it grabs that data and pose as a man in the middle. Browser then sends it all the data encrypted, however if somehow it gets to break the SSL then it can read all the data, to prevent this, future fido devices have to have always turn on mode where they will decrypt data on webpages constantly, but they will have to have a big table to store website public keys. (it’s possible to do this with PGP but it’s not automatic and difficult for non techie)
Tag Yubico in here please, and maybe some browser developeemail providers.
submitted by furiousTaher to yubikey

0 thoughts on “Usb disk security serial key

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *